Type:
Master
Speciality:
042101.14.7 - Jurisprudence
Specialisation:
042101.14.7 - Criminal Justice and Advocacy
Qualification awarded:
Master’s degree
Programme academic year:
2025/2026
Mode of study:
Full time
Language of study:
Հայերեն
General educational component
| Chair code | Name of the course | Credits |
|---|---|---|
| 1904 | Information Technologies in Legal Research | 3 |
|
1-st Semester
Practical work - 30 hours
2 hours per week
MANDATORY
2301/Մ01
1. Purpose of the Course
to empower the students with the skills to use basic applications of information technology and to apply them in their professional field
2. Educational Outcomes
a.knowledge
1. discuss the mechanisms necessary for the application of the electronic justice system, 2. represent the methods of legal information systems selection related to the topic of scientific research, their application modes, b. professional skills. 3. carry out data collection work, 4. analyze and process the collected data, prepare reports, c. generic skills 5. use professional information systems. 3. Description
to empower the students with the skills to use basic applications of information technology and to apply them in their professional field
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. Classes are conducted via computer.
2. Teaching materials and independent work assignments are provided to students in electronic format. 3. Learning (ongoing) and final checks are conducted via computer. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The verification is based on: the results of learning checks with a maximum value of 8 points; participation in the course with a maximum value of 2 points; and final work with a maximum value of 10 points. The questionnaire contains of 5 questions with 2 points each. The point mark interval is 0.5.
To pass the verification, it is requested to earn at least 13 points 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Section 1. Skills in using legal information systems and online resources, data collection.
Section 2. Editors: their use in legal writing and e-government. Section 3. Introduction to creating and managing databases, their use in the e-justice system. Section 4. Skills in using artificial intelligence tools. |
||
| 1901 | Research Planning and Methods | 3 |
|
1-st Semester
15 lectures, 15 practical sessions
2 hours per week
MANDATORY
1901/Մ15
1. Purpose of the Course
The aim of the course is to develop an understanding of science, scientific research, and scientific activity; to teach the fundamental principles of organizing and conducting scientific research; and to provide knowledge and skills related to research methods, working with sources and practical information, as well as the preparation and structuring of scientific research.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge and understanding
1. Describe science as a field of cognition, the fundamentals of legal regulation of scientific activity, the stages of conducting research, as well as the features of structuring scientific work, its language, and style. 2. Explain the methods of scientific research, their types, and the methodological characteristics of the professional field. 3. Discuss the stages of selecting a research topic, planning, and conducting research, as well as their specific features. b. practical professional skills 1. Conduct independent scientific research, analyze the obtained sources, and develop recommendations for the improvement of a legal institution. 2. Select appropriate scientific methods based on the subject of the research. c. generic / transferable skills 1. Demonstrate analytical, creative, and innovative approaches to identifying and solving problems within the field of specialization, as well as research-related issues. 3. Description
The aim of the course is to develop an understanding of science, scientific research, and scientific activity; to teach the fundamental principles of organizing and conducting scientific research; and to provide knowledge and skills related to research methods, working with sources and practical information, as well as the preparation and structuring of scientific research.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. Lectures using active and interactive teaching methods.
2. Creative (problem-based) assignments. 3. Social projects, interactive presentations, decision tree, brainstorming, take a position short presentation. 4. Debates and discussions, role-playing. 5. Independent work based on academic literature. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
Assessment is carried out with a maximum of 20 points, based on the following components:
Ongoing assessment - 4 points Independent work - 5 points Participation - assessed up to a maximum of 2 points Final examination - assessed at 9 points 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
1. Methodology of Jurisprudence.
2. Structure and Organization of Legal Research. 3. Methodology of Empirical Legal Research. 4. Methodology of Theoretical and Metatheoretical Legal Research |
||
Professional educational component
| Chair code | Name of the course | Credits |
|---|---|---|
| 1904 | Comparative Criminal Law | 6 |
|
1-st Semester
Lecture - 40 hours, practical work - 20 hours
4 hours per week
MANDATORY
1904/Մ04
1. Purpose of the Course
to introduce students to the criminal justice systems of certain foreign countries: the USA, countries of Western and Eastern Europe, countries with traditions of Muslim law; to address, through comparative analysis, the most interesting issues of criminal-legal institutes, the construction of punishment systems, sentencing, and the definition of criminal liability for certain types of crimes; to empower the students with knowledge about the compliance of the RA criminal legislation with international conventions.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
1. present the peculiarities of criminal law institutes in the Republic of Armenia and a number of foreign countries, 2. highlight the issues of criminalization of conductd and their punishment in a number of foreign countries, b. professional skills 3. interpret the provisions of the criminal legislation of different countries, 4. interpret the provisions provided for in international conventions and reflected in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Armenia, 5. compare the criminal law systems and institutions of the Republic of Armenia and a number of foreign countries, c. generic skills 6. use various sources of information (Internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles, reports). 3. Description
to introduce students to the criminal justice systems of certain foreign countries: the USA, countries of Western and Eastern Europe, countries with traditions of Muslim law; to address, through comparative analysis, the most interesting issues of criminal-legal institutes, the construction of punishment systems, sentencing, and the definition of criminal liability for certain types of crimes; to empower the students with knowledge about the compliance of the RA criminal legislation with international conventions.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
. debates, discussions, group work,
2. independent study of the topic using reference literature, 3. role games, 4. case studies. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total.
Each of the two mid-term exams is assessed with a maximum of 4 points. The forms of assessment are: 1st mid-term exam (a maximum of 4 points) is conducted in the form of written assignment: students are requested to solve a case. The point mark interval is 0.5. 2nd mid-term exam (a maximum of 4 points) is conducted in the form of research paper defense. Independent work: the student presents an independent work with a maximum of 3 points. The point mark interval is 0.5. Final exam: the exam (a maximum of 9 points) is conducted in oral mode, in face to face format. The examination ticket contains 3 questions with a maximum of 3 points each. The point mark interval is 0.5. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
The concept of comparative criminal law. Principles of criminal law application. International conventions and RA criminal legislation, their interrelation. Direct application of conventional provisions, criminalization of conducts and punitivness. Concept and types of crime in RA and foreign countries. Crime perpetrator. Stages of crime commission and institute of complicity in different legal systems. Circumstances excluding the criminality of an act. Aims and types of punishments in the Republic of Armenia and certain foreign countries. Peculiarities of sentencing and release from punishment, coercive measures application in different criminal legal systems and international conventional provisions. Crimes against the life of a person.Crimes against the health of a person. Crimes against the sexual freedom of a person. Crimes against property. Corruption crimes
|
||
| 1902 | Advocacy in Criminal Proceedings | 6 |
|
1st Semester
40 hours (lectures), 20 hours (practical
Weekly Hours: 4
MANDATORY
1902/Մ13
1. Purpose of the Course
The course aims to develop comprehensive theoretical knowledge and practical skills for students in providing legal assistance as a defense attorney or legal representative in criminal proceedings
2. Educational Outcomes
. Understand the procedures, conditions, and regulations for legal representation and defense in criminal cases.
2. Be familiar with the rights and responsibilities of defense attorneys and legal representatives in providing legal assistance in criminal cases, including the rights of attorneys representing witnesses. b. actual professional abilities 3. Develop the ability to present well-structured legal arguments both in written and oral forms during criminal proceedings. 4. Properly evaluate legal facts and draft legal documents within the framework of criminal proceedings. c. general abilities 5. Analyze legislation, judicial precedents, and legal practice. 6. Utilize various sources of legal information, including online resources, electronic libraries, and scholarly articles. 3. Description
The course aims to develop comprehensive theoretical knowledge and practical skills for students in providing legal assistance as a defense attorney or legal representative in criminal proceedings
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. lectures
2. discussions and debates, preparation of legal speeches, and argumentation development 3. case law analysis 4. independent and group work 5. independent study of legal literature and case law precedents 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The assessment is carried out with a maximum of 20 points as follows:
Two ongoing exams are written, each with a maximum of 4 points. The final exam is oral, with a maximum value of 7 points (the test includes 2 theoretical questions, each worth 2 points, and one practical problem worth 3 points. The grading step is 0.5 points). A maximum of 5 points will be awarded for the ongoing checks, which will be distributed proportionally to the assigned tasks 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Legal advocacy as a form of legal defense activity. The principles of legal advocacy. Legal ethics for advocates. The legal status of an advocate. Fundamental issues of advocacy tactics. The advocate's participation in pre-trial proceedings. The advocate’s participation when coercive measures are applied in legal proceedings. The advocate's participation in the first instance court. The advocate’s speech (pleading). The advocate's participation in the appellate court. The advocate’s participation in the cassation court. The advocate's participation in the enforcement phase of court decisions.
|
||
| 1904 | Problems of Imposition of Punishment | 3 |
|
1-semester
Lecture - 30 hours
2 hours per week
MANDATORY
1904/Մ26
1. Purpose of the Course
to familiarize students with the criminal-legal grounds of sentencing in the Republic of Armenia and foreign countries, as well as the peculiarities of sentencing of certain categories of persons.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
1. distinguish the peculiarities of the institute of sentencing in the Republic of Armenia and foreign countries, highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the practice of sentencing, conduct a comparative analysis of the differences in the regulations on sentencing in the previous and new Criminal Codes of the Republic of Armenia and their purpose, b. professional skills 2. present the general principles and rules of sentencing, the rules of qualification of certain types of crimes. 3. identify errors during sentencing and causes of such errors , 4. analyze Judicial practice, c. generic skills 5. use various sources of information (Internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles, reports), 6. analyze facts, draw conclusions. 3. Description
to familiarize students with the criminal-legal grounds of sentencing in the Republic of Armenia and foreign countries, as well as the peculiarities of sentencing of certain categories of persons.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. lectures,
2. debates, discussions, 3. research of judicial practice on certain topics, 4. students` individual and group work, 5. independent study of the topic using reference literature and judicial precedents. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total. The assessment points are formed from two mid-term exams, individual work and learning checks. 1st mid-term exam allows the student to earn a maximum of 4 points. 2nd mid-term exam (allows the student to earn a maximum of 4 points. Learning checks allow the student to earn a maximum of 4 points. Independent work: the student presents an individual work with a maximum of 5 points. Participation in the course allows the student to earn a maximum of 3 points.
6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
The concept, system and objectives of punishment. General principles of sentencing. Circumstances Mitigating and aggravating the Criminal Liability or Punishment. Sentencing to a milder punishment that provided for by law. ,Calculation of the terms of punishment and the set-off thereof. Conditional sentencing. Principles and rules for sentencing for an inchoate crime: features of sentencing for committing the preparation of a crime or attempt. Factors to be considered when sentencing for an inchoate crime. Sentencing in Case of Combination of Crimes. Sentencing in Case of Combination of Verdicts. Sentencing in Case of Recidivism. Sentencing of a Juvenile offender. Sentencing of a Female offender. Sentencing of an Accomplice. Sentencing of an offender who committed a crime as a member of criminal group.
|
||
| 1902 | Pretrial Investigation Problems in Criminal Procedure | 6 |
|
1st Semester
40 hours (lectures), 20 hours (practical)
Weekly Hours: 4
MANDATORY
1902/Մ02
1. Purpose of the Course
To provide students with the characteristics of pre-trial proceedings, as well as the theoretical and practical underlying problems of ensuring protection of personal rights and legitimate interests and exposure of crime
2. Educational Outcomes
Knowledge and Cognition.
1. Define legal grounds and objectives of pre-trial proceedings, introduce principles realization characteristics. 2. Define legal status of criminal procedure subjects in pre-trial proceedings and scope of their activities. 3. Define the principles of scientific management of investigator’s work. b. Precise professional skills. 4. Analyze features of criminal procedure principles enforcement in pre-trial proceedings. 5. Execute established standards of public participants’ powers of pre-trial proceedings. c. General/ transferable capacities. 6. Realize independent research work. 3. Description
To provide students with the characteristics of pre-trial proceedings, as well as the theoretical and practical underlying problems of ensuring protection of personal rights and legitimate interests and exposure of crime
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. Debates, discussions, group work
2. Students’ independent work 3. Role-play 4. Case study analysis 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The maximum score of assessment is 20 points. The maximum sum score of two periodic examinations is 9 points. First periodic examination is in verbal form with score of 4 points, second periodic examination by research work defense is with score of 5 points. Independent work is with maximum score of 8 points. Participation is with maximum score of 3 points
6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Use of special knowledge during the investigation of crime. Theoretical and scientific grounds of legal expertise, method of expert research research. Subjects conducting the legal expertise and the sytsem of expert centers in the RA. Preparation and execution of legal expertise. Classification of legal expertise. Special objects and solving problems of expert research. Expertises that are implemented during the investigation of crimes of special types
|
||
| 1904 | Juvenile Justice | 3 |
|
2-nd semester
Lecture - 30 hours
2 hours per week
MANDATORY
1904/Մ13
1. Purpose of the Course
to introduce the student to different systems of juvenile justice, their peculiarities, specific requirements set for juvenile proceedings, the system of punishments and re-socialization measures applied to the juvenile offender.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
1. represent the peculiarities and mechanisms of criminal liability and punishment of juveniles, 2. discuss the specific features of police, law enforcement, and judicial bodies activities when dealing with the deviant conduct of a minor, 3. reveal the impact of the family, media, reference groups, and school on juvenile delinquency. b. professional skills 4. analyze the criteria for criminalizing minors` deviant conducts in different countries, 5. assess the role of the juvenile justice system in terms of preventing juvenile delinquency and analyze the factors that determine minors` criminal conduct., c. generic skills 6. use various sources of information (Internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles, reports). 3. Description
to introduce the student to different systems of juvenile justice, their peculiarities, specific requirements set for juvenile proceedings, the system of punishments and re-socialization measures applied to the juvenile offender.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. lectures,
2. debates, discussions, 3. case studiesm , 4. essays, presentation, 5. group work։ 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total.
The assessment points are formed from two mid-term exams, individual work and learning checks. 1st mid-term exam allows the student to earn a maximum of 4 points. 2nd mid-term exam (allows the student to earn a maximum of 5 points. Independent work: the student presents an independent work with a maximum of 8 points. Learning checks allow the student to earn a maximum of 3 points. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Perception and real state of juvenile delinquency. Age of criminal responsibility. Impact of family, school, peers, media, neighborhood on juvenile delinquency. Juvenile Crime and punishments. Juvenile justice: police, law enforcement agencies, court, penitentiary service, probation service. Restorative measures applied to juveniles. Prospects for juvenile justice development
|
||
| 1902 | European Standards of Human Rights Protection in RA Criminal Procedure | 6 |
|
2-nd Semester
40 hours of lectures, 20 hours of practical work
Four hours per week
MANDATORY
1902/Մ04
1. Purpose of the Course
To introduce students to European standards for human rights protection and the specific features of their application in the criminal procedure of the Republic of Armenia
2. Educational Outcomes
a. Professional Knowledge and Expertise
1. Describe the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 2. Explain the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and interpret its application within the criminal procedure of the Republic of Armenia. b. Practical Professional Skills 3. Analyze the role of the European Convention and the European Court’s judgments in the Armenian legal system, with a particular focus on criminal procedure. 4. Identify the legal standards applied by the European Court and the autonomous legal concepts it utilizes. 5. Assess the compliance of Armenian criminal procedure legislation with European human rights protection standards. c. General Competencies 6. Utilize various sources of information, including electronic and non-electronic formats. 3. Description
To introduce students to European standards for human rights protection and the specific features of their application in the criminal procedure of the Republic of Armenia
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. Debates, discussions, and group work
2. Independent student work through professional literature review 3. Role-playing exercises 4. Case study analysis 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
- First mid-term assessment - Oral examination, maximum 4 points.
- Second mid-term assessment - Oral examination, maximum 5 points. - Independent work - Maximum 8 points. - Class participation - Maximum 3 points. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the Armenian Criminal Procedure System
- The European Court of Human Rights and its case law as a source of criminal procedural law in Armenia - European standards for the right to liberty and security - European standards for the right to a fair trial - European standards for the right to respect for private and family life - European standards for the right to an effective remedy - European standards for the right to appeal in criminal cases, compensation for judicial errors, and the principle of ne bis in idem |
||
| 1902 | Problems of Judicial Review in Criminal Procedure | 6 |
|
Second Semester
Lectures 40, practical trainings 20
Four hours per week
MANDATORY
1902/Մ06
1. Purpose of the Course
To provide students with a comprehensive understanding of the criminal-procedural system of judicial review as a complete legal framework, as well as its individual elements (appeal, cassation, extraordinary review).
2. Educational Outcomes
a. professional knowledge and expertise
1. identify the main directions of institutional improvement of the judicial review system in historical-legal, comparative-legal, legal-cultural, law enforcement and legal protection contexts, 2. describe the main requirements for drafting the judicial acts of the Court of Cassation, b. practical professional skills 3. draft complaints for judicial review, draft judicial acts of the Court of Appeal and Cassation, 4. compare the RA and foreign legislation in the field of judicial review, and based on this, develop the most effective models of judicial review, c. general skills 5. creatively apply and develop the knowledge they have, 6. carry out independent studies and research work, as well as conduct teamwork. 3. Description
To provide students with a comprehensive understanding of the criminal-procedural system of judicial review as a complete legal framework, as well as its individual elements (appeal, cassation, extraordinary review).
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. lectures
2. discussions, debates, 3. analysis of draft legal acts and precedents, 4. student independent and group work, 5. independent study of literature and precedents, 6. preparation and presentation of reports. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a maximum of 20 points using the following assessment criteria:
Mid-term assessment: maximum 8 points. Independent work: maximum 4 points. Final exam: maximum 8 points. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
The essence, origin and development of the legal institution of judicial review.
The theory of judicial review. Appeal. Cassation. Special forms of judicial review |
||
| Chair code | Name of the elective course | Credits |
|---|---|---|
| 1902 | Problems of Judicial Expertise | 6 |
|
Second Semester
40 hours (lectures), 20 hours (practical)
Weekly Hours: 4
OPTIONAL
1902/Մ07
1. Purpose of the Course
To provide students with the concept of special knowledge, it’s scope, applicable forms, as well as the current possibilities of expertise of forensic science and other types
2. Educational Outcomes
a. Knowledge and Cognition.
1. Explain general rules, grounds and conditions of legal expertise. 2. Introduce the possibilities and characteristics of expertise of separate types. b. Precise professional skills. 3. Explain the mistakes and gaps during the implementation of legal expertise. 4. Discuss the current state of expertise possibilities in the RA, as well as legal positions expressed in precedential decisions of Court of Cassation of the RA. 5. Take certain approach of an effective correlation between expert’s status and expert research results in the context of evidence inspection and evaluation. c. General capacities. 6. Analyze separate facts of case, make conclusions. 3. Description
To provide students with the concept of special knowledge, it’s scope, applicable forms, as well as the current possibilities of expertise of forensic science and other types
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. Debates, discussions, group work
2. Students' independent works through literature and practical materials. 3. Role-play 4. Field study 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The assessment with maximum score of 20 points of training is done with the following criteria of evaluation. Two periodic examinations are conducted in verbal form, first is with maximum score of 4 points, second is with maximum score of 5 points as a result of resarch work defence. Participation is with maximum score of 3 points. Independent work is with maximum score of 8 points.
6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Use of special knowledge during the investigation of crime. Theoretical and scientific grounds of legal expertise, method of expert research research. Subjects conducting the legal expertise and the sytsem of expert centers in the RA. Preparation and execution of legal expertise. Classification of legal expertise. Special objects and solving problems of expert research. Expertises that are implemented during the investigation of crimes of special types
|
||
| 1902 | The problems of application of case-law in criminal proceedings | 6 |
|
2-nd Semester
Lectures - 40 hours, practical - 20 hours
4 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1902/Մ11
1. Purpose of the Course
To familiarize students with the decisions of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia and the precedent-based positions contained therein. In addition to familiarization, the course aims to teach students to analyze and apply the decisions of the highest judicial authority in criminal justice.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. Knowledge and understanding
1.Describe the characteristics of precedent law in criminal cases as a source of law in the context of comparative legal analysis, particularly in comparison with Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic legal systems, 2.Explain the legislative and practical issues in the application of precedent law in criminal cases, and present the methodological problems in the application of precedent law, b. Core professional skills 3. Draft appeals based on the methodology of applying precedent law, 4. Critically analyze the procedure and content of the decisions made by the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia, Analyze the place and role of precedent law in the field of criminal justice, c. General skills 5. Analyze facts and draw conclusions, 6. Prepare reports, present research results, engage in scientific debates, and substantiate one's viewpoints. 3. Description
To familiarize students with the decisions of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia and the precedent-based positions contained therein. In addition to familiarization, the course aims to teach students to analyze and apply the decisions of the highest judicial authority in criminal justice.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1.Lectures,
2.Discussions, debates, 3.Analysis of precedent cases, 4.Independent and group work of students, 5.Independent study of literature and precedent cases, 6.Preparation and presentation of reports. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The assessment is carried out with a maximum of 20 points as follows. First periodic examination (written) is with maximum score of 4 points, second is with maximum score of 5 points as a result of resarch work defence.
The ongoing assessment is worth up to 8 points and is formed based on the evaluation of work completed during practical sessions. Participation is worth up to 3 points. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
The concept, origin, development, and characteristics of judicial precedent,
The specific features of the status of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia, The interpretative techniques applied by the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia, The precedent law of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia regarding the right to personal liberty, Fundamental human rights, The precedent law of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia regarding charges and fair trial, The precedent law of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia regarding the institution of subsequent judicial control over pre-trial proceedings, The precedent law of the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia regarding the institution of civil claims in criminal proceedings. |
||
| 1902 | Issues of Proof in Criminal Procedure of RA | 3 |
|
3-rd Semester
30 hours lectures
6 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1902/Մ09
1. Purpose of the Course
to transmission theoretical and practical knowledge related to evidentiary law in the criminal procedure of the Republic of Armenia, its individual institutions, their theoretical and methodological foundations, and the process of proof.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. professional knowledge and expertise
1. To present the foundations of evidentiary law, the concept underlying the legislation, the norms built upon it, and the patterns of development in the practice of their application, 2. To explain the specific features of the correct application of the relevant norms of evidentiary law that ensure the requirements of legality, b. practical professional skills 3. To evaluate the foundations of evidentiary law and the approaches existing in professional legal literature regarding them, 4. To assess the approaches in legal literature concerning the concept of evidence and the purpose of proof, as well as to analyze the essence, concept, elements, and objective of proof. Additionally, to identify the key characteristics of evidence, the requirements for its admissibility, and the features of its evaluation. 5. To propose recommendations on the role of the court in the process of proof, the specific characteristics of proof in different stages of proceedings, and the requirements for various types of evidence, c. general competencies 6. To creatively apply and develop acquired knowledge. 3. Description
to transmission theoretical and practical knowledge related to evidentiary law in the criminal procedure of the Republic of Armenia, its individual institutions, their theoretical and methodological foundations, and the process of proof.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. lectures,
2. discussions and debates, 3. completion of individual assignments using the online and offline resources, 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
Assessment Methods and Criteria
At the end of the course, the student is evaluated with a maximum score of 20 points based on the following assessment components: 1.Participation - up to 3 points. 2.Independent work - up to 8 points. 3.Final exam - up to 9 points.The final exam is conducted orally and consists of three theoretical questions. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Proof as a Key Institution of Criminal Procedure, The Subject and Scope of Proof, Procedural Components of Proof, Subjects of Proof, The Concept of Evidence, Classification of Evidence, The Concept and Conditions of Admissibility of Evidence, Relevance, Credibility, and Sufficiency of Evidence, Testimonies of the Suspect, Accused, Convicted Person, or a Suspect/Accused in Another Criminal Case, Testimonies of the Witness and the Victim, Expert Opinion, Material Evidence, Records of Investigative and Procedural Actions and Other Documents
|
||
| 1904 | Criminal liability of legal entities | 3 |
|
3-rd Semester
Lecture - 30 hours
6 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1904/Մ22
1. Purpose of the Course
to familiarize students with the main issues and procedure of criminal liability of legal entities, the RA legislation and international regulations, as well as practical issues in the field of criminal liability of legal entities.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
▪ describe the institute of criminal liability of legal entities, ▪ identify the legislation in the field of criminal liability of legal entities, ▪ explain the issues of criminal liability and punitiveness of legal entities in a number of foreign countries, b. professional skills ▪ interpret the provisions provided for in international conventions and reflected in RA criminal legislation in the context of criminal liability of legal entities, ▪ compare the regulations on criminal liability of legal entities in the Republic of Armenia and in a number of foreign countries, ▪ identify the problems existing in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Armenia when applying the institution of criminal liability of legal entities, ▪ assess the importance of reflecting the provisions contained in international conventions in the legislation of the Republic of Armenia, ▪ assess the application of certain types of sanctions over the legal entities. c. generic skills ▪ use various sources of information (Internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles, reports). 3. Description
to familiarize students with the main issues and procedure of criminal liability of legal entities, the RA legislation and international regulations, as well as practical issues in the field of criminal liability of legal entities.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. debates, discussions, group work,
2. independent study of the topic using educational and reference literature, 3. case studies. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total.
Independent work: the student presents a research with a maximum of 3 points. The point mark interval is 0.5. Learning checks allow the student to earn a maximum of 8 points. Twice per the course, the students are assigned cases (with a maximum of 4 points each), which they need to solve. Final exam: the exam (a maximum of 9 points) is conducted in oral mode, in face to face format. The examination ticket contains 3 questions with a maximum of 3 points each. The point mark interval is 0.5 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Criminal liability of a legal entity. Principles of criminal law and the problem of criminal liability of a legal entity. The scope of legal entities subject to criminal liability. The commission of an act prohibited by criminal law by a legal entity. State response measures applicable to a legal entity that has committed an act prohibited by criminal law. The procedure of bringing a legal entity to criminal liability.
|
||
| 1902 | Criminal procedural and criminalistics issues of public charge protection | 3 |
|
3rd Semester
lectures 20 hours, practical trainings 10 hours6 hours weekly
6 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1902/Մ08
1. Purpose of the Course
The aim of the course is to provide students with comprehensive and in-depth knowledge of the procedural, tactical, and ethical issues of public prosecution defense, and to develop practical skills and abilities in public prosecution defense.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. Professional knowledge and awareness:
1. present strategies for effectively defending the charges, 2. explain the tactical features of defending the charges, b. Practical Professional skills 3. to comment on the legislative provisions of the institute of defense of the charges in the field of criminal proceedings, the essence of defense of the charges, and its tactical features, 4. master the practical skills of the defense of public charges, 5. independently conduct studies and research work, c. General/Transferable Skills 6. Analyze facts, draw conclusions. 3. Description
The aim of the course is to provide students with comprehensive and in-depth knowledge of the procedural, tactical, and ethical issues of public prosecution defense, and to develop practical skills and abilities in public prosecution defense.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. lectures and practical trainings
2. discussions, debates, 3. completing individual assignments using the Internet. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The grade, with a total value of 20 points, is formed from the following components:
The final exam is oral, is assessed 9 points. Participation is assessed at a maximum of 3 points. Independent work is assessed at a maximum of 8 points. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
General characteristics of the defense of the accusation. Basics of the defense of a public accusation.
General provisions of the tactics of public prosecution defense. Key issues in preparing for public prosecution defense. Practical legal issues of public prosecution defense. Tactical features of public prosecution defense during trial. Procedural and criminalistic issues of the final stage of public prosecution defense. Criminal procedural and criminalistic tactical issues of defending public criminal charges in certain types of proceedings. The prosecutor in the judicial review proceedings. |
||
| 1904 | Restorative Justice in Criminal Law | 3 |
|
3-rd Semester
Lecture - 20 hours, practical work - 10 hours
6 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1904/Մ21
1. Purpose of the Course
to familiarize the students to the concept, essence, procedure, results of restorative justice, RA legislation and international regulations and tools in the field of restorative justice.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
1. describe the concept, essence and procedure of restorative justice 2. explain the institute of mediation b. professional skills 3. describe the role of restorative justice at the international level 4. identify the provisions of the RA legislation on restorative justice and analyze the gaps of legal regulations, 5. assess the provisions of international conventions on restorative justice, c. generic skills 6. analyze facts, draw conclusions. 3. Description
to familiarize the students to the concept, essence, procedure, results of restorative justice, RA legislation and international regulations and tools in the field of restorative justice.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. debates, discussions, group work,
2. independent study of the topic using reference literature, 3. role games, 4. case studies.։ 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total.
Independent work: the student presents a research paper with a maximum of 3 points. The point mark interval is 0.5. Learning checks allow the student to earn a maximum of 8 points. Twice per course students get written case-assignments (with a maximum of 4 points each). Final exam: the exam (a maximum of 9 points) is conducted in oral mode, in face to face format. The examination ticket contains 3 theoretical questions with a maximum of 3 points each. The point mark interval is 0.5. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
The essence, procedure and results of restorative justice. Restorative and punitive justice. The institute of mediation, reconciliation of the parties. Proceedings of cooperation and agreement. Peculiarities of restorative justice in juvenile cases. The role of the probation service in restorative justice. Functions of probation officers.
|
||
| 1904 | Information technology and criminal law | 3 |
|
3-red Semester
Lecture - 20 hours, practical work - 10 hours
6 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1904/Մ23
1. Purpose of the Course
to familiarize the students with the crimes committed using information technologies in the field of computer data security, as well as the impact of new achievements in the IT sector on criminal liability and sentencing.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
1. describe crimes against computer data security, 2. clarify the relationship peculiarities of international conventions and RA legislation in criminalizing conducts in the field of computer data security, 3. highlight the issues of criminal liability and punishment in the cases when artificial intelligence was engaged, b. professional skills 4. interpret the provisions of international conventions and RA criminal legislation in terms of enroachments in the field of computer data security, 5. compare the regulations of criminal liability for criminal conduct using IT technologies in the Republic of Armenia and a number of foreign countries, identify the shortcomings of RA criminal legislation in terms of liability for criminal conduct using IT technologies or targeted against computer data security, c. generic skills 6. use various sources of information (Internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles, reports). 3. Description
to familiarize the students with the crimes committed using information technologies in the field of computer data security, as well as the impact of new achievements in the IT sector on criminal liability and sentencing.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. debates, discussions, group work,
2. independent study of the topic using reference literature, 3. case studies. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total.
Independent work: the student presents an individual work with a maximum of 4 points. Participation in the course allows the student to earn a maximum of 3 points Learning checks allow the student to earn a maximum of 4 points. The students are requested to pass quizzes 4 times (a maximum of 1 point each) per course Final exam: the exam (a maximum of 9 points) is conducted in oral mode, in face to face format. The examination ticket contains 3 theoretical questions with a maximum of 3 points each. The point mark interval is 0.5 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Crimes committed using computer technologies. Computer theft. Determining the place of commission of a crime in cases of criminal encroachments against the security of computer data or using IT technologies. Criminal liability of artificial intelligence. The role of artificial intelligence in justice administration
|
||
| 1904 | Problems of Penitentiary Procedure Improvement | 3 |
|
3-rd Semester
Lecture -30 hours
6 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1904/Մ17
1. Purpose of the Course
to familiarize the student with the penitentiary procedures of different countries, the global changes taking place in the field, the criminological characteristics, causes and external factors of crimes committed by convicts and employees of penitentiary institutions, as well as by persons sentenced to non-custodial punishments, the personality of the convicted person, and measures to prevent these crimes.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
1. describe the penitentiary procedures and systems in different countries, explain the changes taking place in the penitentiary sector in the world and highlight their consequences, get acquainted with the innovations introduced into the penitentiary sector /for example, private penitentiary institutions/ 2. define the criminological characteristics of crimes committed by both convicts serving sentences in places of detention and employees of penitentiary institutions, as well as by persons sentenced to non-custodial punishments 3. determine the internal causes and external conditions of crimes committed in places of detention, explain the peculiarities of the criminal conduct of a convict who committed a crime while serving his sentence 4. indicate the mechanisms and means of combating crime in places of detention b. professional skills 5. analyze the penitentiary systems of different countries, compare the penitentiary systems of the Republic of Armenia and a number of foreign countries c. generic skills 6. use various sources of information (internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles, reports). 3. Description
to familiarize the student with the penitentiary procedures of different countries, the global changes taking place in the field, the criminological characteristics, causes and external factors of crimes committed by convicts and employees of penitentiary institutions, as well as by persons sentenced to non-custodial punishments, the personality of the convicted person, and measures to prevent these crimes.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. visits to RA penitentiary institutions,
2. debates, discussions, group work, 3. specific situations and case analysis, 4. independent work of students based on the study of reference literature and practical visits 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total.
Learning checks are conducted via oral interrogation and allow the student to earn a maximum of 8 points. Participation in the course allows the student to earn a maximum of 3 points Final exam: the exam (a maximum of 9 points) is conducted based on the examination ticket, in oral mode, in face to face format 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Subject and problems of the discipline “Issues of Improving Penitentiary Procedure”. The penitentiary system in a number of foreign countries. The concept and problems of the institute of volunteers. The peculiarities of custodial punishments` implementation in different countries. The peculiarities of non-custodial punishments` implementation in different countries. The basic rights and obligations of convicts in a number of foreign countries. The concept of correction and correctional plan of convicts, the concept and problems of resocialization. The peculiarities of serving a custodial punishment by minors, women, as well as pregnant women and women with children under 3 years old in different countries. The concept of privatization of penal institutions. The concept of "penitentiary" crime. , Causes, motivation formation and prevention of criminal conduct during the service of punishment. Prohibited items in penitentiary institutions. Main determinants of violent, mercenary-violent, mercenary crime in penitentiary al institutions. Crime prevention measures in penitentiary institutions.
|
||
| 1902 | Professional Skills of Lawer (Criminal Law) | 3 |
|
2-nd Semester
30 hours lectures
2 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1902/Մ12
1. Purpose of the Course
To develop practical legal skills necessary for drafting procedural documents and effectively performing the functions of a defense attorney, investigator, prosecutor, and judge in various stages of criminal proceedings
2. Educational Outcomes
a. Professional Knowledge and Expertise
1. Understand the professional skills of a lawyer, investigator, and prosecutor. 2. Explain the organizational aspects of legal practice in the roles of an investigator, prosecutor, and defense attorney. b. Practical Professional Skills 3. Apply the professional skills of a defense attorney, investigator, prosecutor, and judge. 4. Draft procedural documents. 5. Reference relevant decisions of the Court of Cassation of Armenia and the European Court of Human Rights. c. General Competencies 6. Creatively apply and develop acquired legal knowledge. 3. Description
To develop practical legal skills necessary for drafting procedural documents and effectively performing the functions of a defense attorney, investigator, prosecutor, and judge in various stages of criminal proceedings
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. Lectures
2. Discussions and debates 3. Analysis of precedent-setting cases 4. Independent and group work 5. Independent study of legal literature and case law 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
Total Maximum Score: 20 points
- First mid-term assessment - Oral examination, maximum 4 points. - Second mid-term assessment - Oral examination, maximum 5 points. - Independent work - Maximum 8 points. - Class participation - Maximum 3 points. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
General characteristics of practical legal skills
- Role of the defense attorney in criminal proceedings - Defense tactics - General procedural framework for drafting criminal case documents - Drafting decisions on initiating a criminal case - Drafting decisions on recognizing an individual as a suspect or accused - Drafting decisions on rejecting the initiation of a criminal case - Techniques for drafting various procedural documents - Drafting final procedural documents and their appeal procedures |
||
| 1904 | Criminal-legal Issues of Corruption Prevention | 3 |
|
2-nd Semester
Lecture - 30 hours
2 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1904/Մ20
1. Purpose of the Course
to introduce students to current criminal - legal issues related to corruption prevention, international legal documents and domestic legislation on the fight against corruption, obstacles encountered in their application and ways to overcome them
2. Educational Outcomes
a. knowledge
1. identify international and national legal documents aimed at preventing corruption, 2. explain international developments in the field of corruption prevention, describe mechanisms aimed at preventing corruption, 3. define corruption crimes and their characteristics, b. professional skills 4. analyze the criteria for criminalizing corruption conduct in different countries, as well as the factors determining corrupt criminal behavior, 5. compare the scope and characteristics of corruption crimes in different countries, c. generic skills 6. use various sources of information (Internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles, reports, creatively apply and develop the knowledge). 3. Description
to introduce students to current criminal - legal issues related to corruption prevention, international legal documents and domestic legislation on the fight against corruption, obstacles encountered in their application and ways to overcome them
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. debates, discussions, group work,
2. independent study of the topic using literature and practical data, 3. essays, 4. case studies. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is assessed with a 20-point total.
Learning checks allow the student to earn a maximum of 4 points. Independent work: the student presents an individual work with a maximum of 5 points. Participation in the course allows the student to earn a maximum of 2 points Final exam: the exam (a maximum of 9 points) is conducted in oral mode, in face to face format. The examination ticket contains 3 theoretical questions with a maximum of 3 points each 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Concept and main features of corruption, directions of combating it. RA legislation on combating corruption. International structures for combating corruption (GRECO, OECD), RA`s membership in these structures and the obligations assumed. International Legal framework for combating corruption, it`s significance and impact on the development of anti-corruption legislation in the Republic of Armenia. Definition and classification of corruption crimes, provision of new corruption-related crimes in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Armenia. Shortcomings of corruption-related crimes, analysis of the list of corruption crimes defined by the new Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, innovations in the new Code.
|
||
| 1902 | Ethics in criminal procedure | 3 |
|
2-nd Semester
30 hours
2 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1902/Մ10
1. Purpose of the Course
to familiarize students with the moral foundations of criminal procedural activity, the ethical requirements imposed on the court and participants in criminal proceedings, as well as the rules of criminal procedural culture and etiquette
2. Educational Outcomes
a. professional knowledge and expertise
1. Present the content of moral relationships formed in criminal proceedings. 2. Explain the ethical foundations of criminal procedural proof. 3. Present the ethical requirements for the administration of criminal justice. b. practical professional skills 4. Conduct discussions and debates on the regulation of legal and moral relationships during criminal proceedings. 5. Assess the ethical significance of the activities of the court and participants in criminal proceedings. c. general competencies 6. Use various sources of information (internet resources, electronic libraries, scientific articles), analyze facts, and draw conclusions 3. Description
to familiarize students with the moral foundations of criminal procedural activity, the ethical requirements imposed on the court and participants in criminal proceedings, as well as the rules of criminal procedural culture and etiquette
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. lectures,
2. discussions and debates, 3. completion of individual assignments using the online and offline resources, 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
At the end of the course, the student is evaluated with a maximum score of 20 points based on the following assessment components:
1.Participation - up to 3 points. 2.Independent work - up to 8 points. 3.Final exam - up to 9 points. 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Morality and ethics; Main categories (components) of ethics; Legal ethics as a type of professional ethics; Moral foundations of criminal procedural legislation; Ethical foundations of the administration of criminal justice; Ethical foundations of criminal procedural proof; Ethical foundations of the procedural activities of public participants in proceedings; Ethical foundations of the criminal procedural activities of a lawyer; Culture of criminal procedural activity
|
||
| 1902 | The Issues of the Specific Types of Proceedings in the Criminal Procedure | 3 |
|
2-nd Semester
30 hours lectures
2 hours per week
OPTIONAL
1902/Մ44
1. Purpose of the Course
to provide students with deeper and more comprehensive knowledge on special types of proceedings by also presenting the existing issues in legislation, legal practice, and established case law related to them. This, in turn, will enhance students’ professional skills and abilities for conducting independent studies and research on these types of proceedings
2. Educational Outcomes
· Identify the main directions for the improvement of special types of proceedings in historical-legal, comparative-legal, and practical-legal contexts,
· Describe the legal grounds and issues of special types of proceedings, · Present the characteristics of special types of proceedings, · Present legislative solutions and case law formed by the Constitutional Court of Armenia, the Court of Cassation, and the European Court of Human Rights regarding special types of proceedings, · Present the practical problems emerging in the legal application of special types of proceedings. b. Practical professional skills: · Develop analytical skills related to the features of special types of proceedings, · Make suggestions for the improvement of legislation, · Compare Armenian and foreign legislation on special types of proceedings and evaluate the effectiveness of their models, · Apply corresponding legislative mechanisms in practice. c. General/transferable skills: · Creatively apply and develop acquired knowledge, · Conduct independent research and investigation, · Demonstrate a critical approach to the provided information, justifying their views with logical, comprehensive, and well-structured arguments. 3. Description
to provide students with deeper and more comprehensive knowledge on special types of proceedings by also presenting the existing issues in legislation, legal practice, and established case law related to them. This, in turn, will enhance students’ professional skills and abilities for conducting independent studies and research on these types of proceedings
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
1. Lectures with presentations and interactive methods (films, multimedia),
2. Independent research work, 3. Scientific debates and discussions, 4. Analysis of specific situations and problem-solving. 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The course is graded on a maximum of 20 points, formed as follows:
Mandatory component: Final exam - maximum of 9 points Additional components: Independent work - maximum of 4 points Ongoing assessments - maximum of 4 points Participation - maximum of 3 points 6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Topic 1: The essence and significance of special (extraordinary) proceedings, Topic 2. Proceedings with Private Prosecution, Topic 3. Proceedings by Agreement, Topic 4. Accelerated proceedings, Topic 5. Proceedings for imposing a fine by agreement, Topic 6. Cooperation proceedings, Topic 7. Proceedings in the absence of the accused (In absentia proceedings).
|
||
Other educational modules
| Chair code | Name of the course | Credits |
|---|---|---|
| 1902 | Scientific Seminar | 2 |
|
1-st, 2-nd and 3-rd Semester
30 hours seminar
2 hours weekly
MANDATORY
1902/1904/Մ00
1. Purpose of the Course
To present master’s students with the fundamental issues of judicial law and advocacy, as well as related research studies, and assist in choosing research questions for their master’s theses. Develop their skills and abilities in preparing and delivering scientific presentations and reports, as well as engaging in academic debates on current issues. Provide methodological support for conducting scientific research
2. Educational Outcomes
a. Profession knowledge and awareness
1. present issues of criminal justice field, 2. independently choose scientific research methods, b. Practical Professional skills 3. conduct independent scientific research, 4. present scientific reports and presentations. c. General/Transferable Skills 5. effectively use various information sources (including the Internet) to extract, critically analyze and present information, 6. analyze facts, draw conclusions. 3. Description
To present master’s students with the fundamental issues of judicial law and advocacy, as well as related research studies, and assist in choosing research questions for their master’s theses. Develop their skills and abilities in preparing and delivering scientific presentations and reports, as well as engaging in academic debates on current issues. Provide methodological support for conducting scientific research
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
Preparation of didactic materials
Scientific presentations and reports Discussion and debate 5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
It is assessed in a pass/fail format. Master’s students receive a passing grade if the present brief reports on their research conducted within the framework of their master’s thesis, outlining their research plan, thesis statements, progress, and results, in accordance with the criteria set by YSU for the given semester
6. Main sections of the course
Տիտղոսաթերթ
Ստորագրությունների էջ Համառոտագիր Բովանդակություն Ներածություն Հիմնական մաս Եզրակացություններ (և առաջարկություններ) Օգտագործված գրականության ցանկ Հավելվածներ |
||
| 0000 | Professional Internship | 3 |
|
3-rd Semester
3 weeks
6 hours daily
MANDATORY
1902/1906/Մ13
1. Purpose of the Course
To engage students in the functions of law enforcement, judicial bodies and other government agencies and provide access to practical materials. Develop students’ professional practical skills and competencies in the field of criminal justice, focusing on legislation and its application in practice. Enrich ongoing research work with practical materials acquired during the internship.
2. Educational Outcomes
a. Professional knowledge and awareness
1. Present the sectoral legislation, institutional framework, and judicial practice in the field of criminal law, criminal procedural law and penitentiary law. 2. Describe the practical challenges in the application of legislation in the professional field. b. Practical Professional skills 3. Apply acquired theoretical knowledge in practice. 4. Provide legal assessment of problematic situations. 5. Conduct legal consulting. c. General/Transferable Skills 6. Draft procedural documents, relevant motions and appeals. 7. Research and identify relevant precedent decisions and apply them accordingly. 3. Description
To engage students in the functions of law enforcement, judicial bodies and other government agencies and provide access to practical materials. Develop students’ professional practical skills and competencies in the field of criminal justice, focusing on legislation and its application in practice. Enrich ongoing research work with practical materials acquired during the internship.
4. Teaching and Learning Styles and Methods
The internship is organized according to a program jointly developed and approved with the academic supervisor. It is conducted outside YSE, within judicial system of the Republic of Armenia, the Prosecution Office of the Republic of Armenia, the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia, the Chamber of Advocates of the Republic of Armenia, the Chamber of Notaries, as well as in public and private institutions, etc.
5. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The internship is assessed on a pass/fail basis. It is considered successful if the master’s student has participated in the internship, completed the assigned tasks as outlined in the program, submitted the required reports and received a positive evaluation form the internship provider.
6. Basic Bibliography
7. Main sections of the course
Introduction to the working characteristics of the internship location.
Clear formulation of the work to be performed. Drawing up a schedule of work to be performed. Performing the necessary work according to the schedule |
||
| 0000 | Master's Thesis | 18 |
|
3-rd Semester
Individual work` 540 hours
MANDATORY
1902/1904/Մ00
1. Purpose of the Course
To reflect students’ knowledge received through discipline of “Law”, to apply the acquired knowledge in research work, to raise issues related to the field of criminal justice, and to propose both theoretical and practical solutions.
2. Educational Outcomes
b. Practical professional skills
1. describe the professional characteristics of criminal justice field, 2. identify the professional issues of criminal justice field: c. general/transferable skills 4. apply acquired theoretical knowledge in practice, 5. conduct research work: 3. Description
To reflect students’ knowledge received through discipline of “Law”, to apply the acquired knowledge in research work, to raise issues related to the field of criminal justice, and to propose both theoretical and practical solutions.
4. Evaluation Methods and Criteria
The public defense of the master thesis is conducted in accordance with the procedure for the final certification of graduates of institutions implementing higher educational programs, approved by Order No. 1282-N of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Armenia, dated November 7, 2017
5. Main sections of the course
Title page
Signature page Abstract Table of contents Introduction Main body Conclusions (and Recommendations) List of references and bibliography Appendices |
||
